Queen Palm

ASPCA has no page for this plant, and no other source we use covers it. That is not a statement that it is safe. Keep dogs, cats and horses from eating it. This differs from a plant ASPCA has evaluated and rated non-toxic: it means not assessed, not cleared. That said, ASPCA DOES list and rate several other true palms in the same family (Areca, Majesty, Kentia, Lady, Parlor, Dwarf/Good Luck, Manila, Canary Date, Belmore Sentry) as Non-Toxic, a consistent family-level (Arecaceae) pattern worth noting for context, though not a substitute for a species-specific verdict. Important distinction: several very common 'palm' names actually belong to CYCADS, an entirely unrelated and far more dangerous plant group: Sago Palm (Cycas revoluta) and Cardboard Palm (Zamia furfuracea) are both cycads confirmed severely/potentially fatally toxic by ASPCA (liver failure), and neither is a true palm at all despite the name. Don't assume 'palms are generally fine' across that line. Separately, several non-university sources note fallen Queen Palm fruit and seeds as a physical choking/GI-obstruction hazard for dogs given their size and hardness: a mechanical risk, not a chemical toxicity claim, and not independently verified against a university or ASPCA source; included as general common-sense caution only, clearly labeled as such rather than as sourced toxicity data.